What “catholic” should also mean

καθ’ ὅλου

— there it is in its original form, dolled up in those adorable Greek letters (romanized it would be kath’olou, meaning something like ‘in a general way’, or ‘according to the whole’), and inspiring the Latin rendering that gives us the English word ‘universal’ (adding its own etymological twist, suggesting a ‘turning’ – vertere –  ‘to the one’ – uni).  Although appropriated by the Roman Catholic tradition as its special title, from the very beginning the Christian church considered itself ‘universal’, insofar as it bore a message for all. Here was no ethnic religion or tribal creed, and even less an esoteric club destined for a privileged few, but instead a global News Broadcast – both very old, and very new – and one addressed to the human race as such (past, present and future).

The Protestant observer – and to some extent the Orthodox – may view the Roman Catholic ‘usurpation’ of the term as betraying a kind of imperialist ambition, designing to lord it over all believers, and to exact its own exclusive version of the faith of all those who wish to adhere to ‘the whole truth and nothing but’.  Without addressing the inevitable controversies the competing claims of rival Christian magisteria generate, I only suggest it would be of service to those who call themselves Catholic (upper case) to consider another dimension of their aspiration to also being ‘catholic’ (lower case).

With catechisms and summas and (in closely defined cases) infallible popes, the Catholic Church could give the impression that it understands its universality to be only that of already including all truth within its scope, bar none. I would not dispute – I hasten to add – that the creed and the catechism do indeed possess a completeness of their own, in the sense that they establish the basic narrative, define the radical truths and point out borders within which alone the fullness of Truth can finally unfold, like a peacock’s tail, and shine. To what extent, however, it already fully and finally shines is quite another matter.peacock

We are told categorically in the Gospel that the Spirit of God will eventually lead us into all the truth – future tense – (John 16,13), and Bl. John Henry Newman made explicit what was always there in Christian revelation, but not always noticed, namely:  that there is indeed a development of Christian doctrine, that it is a living thing that matures and grows with time, and that flowers and fruits will later appear that no one suspected who only viewed the roots and trunk. Thus, my modest suggestion: today as never before, it would be salubrious if Catholics would emphasize not so much their claim to possess all the saving truth, but rather the far deeper and more adventurous claim to be open to all the truth.  The fact that the latter claim depends in a very important way on the first does not entitle us to overlook the other fact, namely, that the first is a threat to the very wholeness it professes if it does not open up its doors and windows to the second.

It is not just clever apologetics to point out that the Logos that became man in Christ is the same one about whom the philosophers had enquired since human enquiry began.  It was not without due reflection that the first great Christian philosopher, St. Justin Martyr (II. AD), insisted on continuing to wear his philosopher’s cape after his conversion. And try to downsize the following New Testament declarations to fit the mold of a simple, first-century sage, who just wanted us to be nice to each other, like: “He is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation; for in him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible … He is before all things and in him all things hold together,” (Col. 1, 15-17); or: “That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon and touched with our hands, concerning the word of life – the life was made manifest and we saw it, and testify to it…” (1 John. 1, 1-2); or: “He reflects the glory of God and bears the very stamp of his nature, upholding the universe by his word of power.” (Heb. 1, 3). These are hardly throw-away verses.

And St. John the Evangelist knew perfectly well into which age-old philosophical lexicon he was dipping when he said: “In the beginning was the Logos (the Word), and the Word was with God and the Word was God…” (John 1,1). As he later states, that’s the Word that became flesh. Old Heraclitus would have perked up his ears, and Aristotle’s definition of man as zoon logikon (‘Logos-based’ animal) would find itself infused with new meaning.  And Jesus Christ himself, although he was given to understatement and was intent on gradual, pedagogical preparation – his whole coming, after all, was designed to provide a kind of ‘buffer’ between our obtuseness and his absolute power and glory, courtesy of the Flesh and Blood he received from the Virgin – he still let one show-stopper emerge from his otherwise so careful lips: “Before Abraham was, I am.” (John 8,58).

The ‘Egyptian gold’ already abundantly mined from the Egyptians themselves, from the Greeks and Romans, and from the northern folks of Europe, built a Christian civilization unlike any other human construct of history. As it now fades from Europe, the still unmet challenge of stepping with a Christian mind into the Word’s other articulations – especially in India and China – will invite new rays of light to shine upon the Gospel, and draw attention to its overlooked corners and contexts. But also – in at least equal measure – we shall see unsuspected light from the Gospel shine into and upon the world of the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Buddhist sutras, the Daoist and Confucian classics, and all the other configurations of the Good, the True and the Beautiful already outlined elsewhere, but still understated (or forgotten) in their explicit formulations.

Discernment of spirits, of course, will continue to be the order of the day, as it already is within the Christian tradition itself. And though the Lord commanded us not to uproot the tares, less we pull out the good grain with it, he did not forbid us to identify that grain, wherever it may grow. I look to the day in which being “Catholic” will also necessarily mean being “catholic”: that is, being one who holds up to all traditions that ultimate mirror, in which any truth can find its best station, any good its final bearings, and any beauty its unmistakable consummation – there where any human of good will and honest mind can witness the universality of revelation in a looking-glass that looks into eternity without distortion, in Him who said “‘Let light shine out of darkness’, [and] who has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ.” (2 Cor. 4, 6).


First Review of Kelly Anthology (link e tradução portuguesa)

tradução portuguesa (resenha em inglês publicado no The National Catholic Register, 12 de maio de 2018):

Bernard Kelly e o vigor do pensamento leigo

Gerald J. Russello

A CATHOLIC MIND AWAKE – The Writings of Bernard Kelly. Edited by Scott Randall Paine. Angelico Press, 2017.  (UMA MENTE CATÓLICA DESPERTA – Os escritos de Bernard Kelly) – ainda sem tradução para o Português.

Este livro é um bem-vindo e importante ato de recuperação. Bernard Kelly (1907-1958) foi um católico comum, que viveu em Windsor com uma grande família e trabalhou como bancário. Mas, Kelly tinha outra vida.

 Por quase três décadas, Kelly forneceu ensaios filosóficos sofisticados e resenhas, em primeiro lugar para o Blackfriars, o prestigioso periódico dos Dominicanos. Nessa coletânea, os escritos de Kelly são vistos pela primeira vez desde sua publicação original.

Não é claro, a partir da excelente introdução de Scott Randall Paine, um professor de filosofia da Universidade de Brasília, o que levou Kelly à sua estranha vida dupla. Entre as demandas de seu trabalho e de seus seis filhos – sem falar da tuberculose que o abateu por dois anos nos anos 1940 –, claramente alguma força motora o compeliu a escrever de modo a entender os desafios filosóficos e religiosos de seu tempo.

Kelly escrevia na esteira de uma grande série de convertidos católicos, desde John Henry Newman a Christopher Dawson, passando por G. K. Chesterton e Eric Gill, cuja apologética e outros trabalhos definiram o catolicismo inglês por um século. Kelly foi herdeiro e defensor dessa tradição.

Dado o período em que ele escreveu, seus escritos aparentemente mostram a confiança filosófica do tomismo de meados do século, antes das convulsões dos anos 1960 e 1970. Contudo, nesses escritos, veem-se mais do que exposições secas: Kelly tem lampejos intuitivos derivados de sua vivência nas finanças e como homem de família que conecta suas preocupações filosóficas com o mundo como um todo. Há muito mais aqui do que se pode suspeitar à primeira vista.

 O livro é dividido em quatro seções principais, cobrindo tópicos que vão desde Gerard Manley Hopkins (de quem Kelly foi um crítico astuto e sensível), à justiça econômica e àquilo que hoje seria chamado de religião comparada.

 Num ensaio de 1935, “The Bourgeois Position” [algo como ‘a atitude burguesa’], Kelly liga as falhas dessa atitude ao pecado da preguiça, que é como uma lassidão espiritual. Kelly não fala da perspectiva de um monastério ou reitoria, mas desde o mundo dos negócios. Ele sabe o valor do livre mercado e o que é preciso para cuidar da família, mas também conhece a tentação de pensar que o sucesso econômico é tudo o que importa. Mas, a despeito de tudo, ele conclui que um católico não pode ser inteiramente ‘do’ mercado. Desta crença “deriva o modo de sua espiritualidade burlesca… Deixa-o à vontade para ir à igreja. Buscador de conforto em tudo, ele impôs à religião… os limites de seus sentimentos relaxantes, preenchendo o corpo de sua fé com um caloroso brilho sentimental”.

 Kelly escreveu durante as perturbações econômicas dos anos 1930 e rejeitou a solução comunista em virtude do ateísmo e da natureza essencialmente desumanizante dessa solução; ao invés disso, “o impulso da ética cristã não pode bloquear a melhoria da natureza das atividades industriais e dos produtos industriais.”

 Atuando no pensamento distributivista, Kelly defendeu que o trabalho deveria ser belo e humanamente proporcionado; com isso, ele não era um nostálgico, mas procurou explicar os princípios sociais católicos no mundo real.

 O outro assunto que distingue Kelly é sua interação leiga com as religiões não cristãs.

 Kelly, por exemplo, correspondeu-se por anos com o importante filósofo indiano e historiador Ananda Coomaraswamy, que se tornou um interlocutor para Kelly entre as tradições filosóficas ocidental e oriental. Essa coletânea contém os resultados dessa conversação que perdurou por toda a vida de Kelly.

 Essa pode ser uma estrada perigosa; outros católicos que buscaram uma filosofia ‘perene’ sob as especificidades das diferentes tradições, por fim, perderam a sua fé. Mas, a interação com essas tradições não pode ser evitada no mundo moderno.

 Kelly se nos apresenta como um modelo de católico não temeroso de mergulhar profundamente em textos hindus (aprendendo Sânscrito para isso), a fim de entender os conceitos não cristãos acerca do divino, mas tampouco esquecendo-se de levar o Evangelho consigo. O seu discurso de 1956 à Sociedade São Tomás de Aquino de Cambridge, publicado como “A Thomistic Approach to the Vedanta” (Uma abordagem tomista do Vedanta) faz exatamente isso discutindo a metafísica tomista no contexto das escrituras hindus.

 Todo o conhecimento nos é dado para nos ajudar a chegar à verdade, acreditava Kelly, e outras tradições podem nos auxiliar a vermos Deus de nossa perspectiva. Que ele mantivesse sua fé, e até mesmo a fortalecesse, isto é óbvio, tal como se reflete numa profunda meditação sobre a Via Sacra em 1956.

 Como nota Paine, Kelly morreu antes que o Papa Joao XXIII anunciasse sua intenção de chamar o Concílio Vaticano Segundo. Não sabemos como Kelly teria reagido a esse evento marcante, apesar de que ele certamente teria recebido bem a ênfase renovada do laicato no desenvolvimento do pensamento da Igreja.

 Esse volume lembra-nos do vigor do pensamento laico quando aberto tanto às questões contemporâneas quanto ao pensamento da Igreja.

The 99% Percent Problem


How often we hear that over 90% of this, or 95% of that, or even 99% of something else surprisingly dwarfs the remaining few percent in the calculation, and that our world and our lives seem to get almost squeezed out of existence in their appointed share of reality.  Are we really living in that little blue slice of the pie in the picture above? Take a look at some of the stats:

99% of the space of the entire cosmos is empty.

99% of every atom is also empty.

More than 95% of the world’s ocean floor is still unmapped and the life forms that inhabit it largely unknown.

Over 90% of all the living cells in our body are not human (…not to leave this one hanging in the air:  they are microorganisms).

Over 95% of the extant matter in the cosmos has hitherto escaped our analysis (so-called ‘dark energy and matter’). All our vaunted knowledge of material reality is about that remaining 5%.

99.9% of the history of the universe had already spent itself by the time we humans came onto the scene.

99,5% of all the species that have ever existed on earth are extinct.

Well over 90% of our genetic material we share with other primates, and most of it even with lower life forms.

(There are some others, but I think that will do.)

There doesn’t seem to be much entity left over after these overwhelming statistical genocides.  However, only too often such statistics have been used by the purveyors of scientism in order to divest our human experience of meaning, value and purpose.  We are, they will repeat mantra-like, just a teeny-weeny speck in the immeasurable vastness of space; just one more animal, one more mammal, among all the other products of random evolutionary throws of the dice, differing by only a slender sliver of genetic information; and our so treasured ‘world’ is actually just so much empty space, patterned upon empty atoms and empty galaxies, sporadically sprinkled with transient molecules and lonely stars; and the fact that our ‘life form’ is still around is at most just good luck, since almost every other species has long since vanished, and the ones that are still with us may not be around for long. Modern mavens of the supremacy of science love to wow us with these quantitative boasts. But they are, as usual, misguided.

Consider the following: If I have a hundred pebbles and only one of them happens to be a diamond, its 1% status in the pile of rock hardly compromises its value. And one sound philosophical conclusion from the declaration that atoms and cosmic space are predominantly empty is to note that neither of those perspectives are actually relevant to living a human life. Leaving the empty macro- and microcosmoses to the astronauts and nuclear physicists, we who dwell in the mesocosmos (that is, the surrounding spectacle greeted by our five senses) have a world very full indeed – of things, people, mountains, rivers, oceans, continents, and marvels in abundance. Read the world’s best poets and you’ll learn more about this saner view of reality, and also know instinctively that our world is truly a full and overflowing cornucopia of very solid wonders.

We dwellers of the humble earth eagerly wait to see pictures of the deep sea creatures yet to be found, as we also greet every new butterfly or lizard discovered in the Amazon. We rejoice in the ocean of microbes that our human tissues swim in, grateful for their contribution to our well-being and happy to be in the cellular minority.  That the scientists still call 95% of the cosmos dark stuff (that is, unknown) seems to us a salubrious humiliation in the face of their often over-preening claims of the past. And that most of the species of earth have already passed into history we find astonishing indeed, so rich and various are the countless few that still parade before us.

It hardly matters that most of astronomical and geological time is behind us (where else could it go?), for the story of our remarkable race continues to be extraordinary, whether its time on earth has lasted half an everlasting aeon or just half an hour. And – thinking again of the diamond – if we have only a small portion of exclusively human genetic material, that handful of DNA is about as potent and momentous as that diamond among the pebbles, or of a uranium atom in an A-bomb, or of any lonely Adam looking out at an endless zoo, awash with wonder at a vision only Infinity could have fashioned.